Fun fact.

Kinja'd!!! "not for canada - australian in disguise" (for-canada)
06/21/2016 at 18:57 • Filed to: RANDOM CANADIAN CAR TRIVIA

Kinja'd!!!3 Kinja'd!!! 12
Kinja'd!!!

Between 2000 and 2003, Dodge only sold one car (car, not truck/van) in Canada. The Viper.

Everything else was called a Chrysler, for some reason.


DISCUSSION (12)


Kinja'd!!! El Rivinado > not for canada - australian in disguise
06/21/2016 at 19:03

Kinja'd!!!7

That's because between 2000 and 2003, the Viper was the only thing from Dodge worth owning.


Kinja'd!!! Sneaky Pete > El Rivinado
06/21/2016 at 19:08

Kinja'd!!!2

2003 is debatable.


Kinja'd!!! Sam > not for canada - australian in disguise
06/21/2016 at 19:12

Kinja'd!!!1

The profit margins were probably higher on a Chrysler than a Dodge. Maybe they were offsetting import duties by going upmarket (even though the cars weren’t upmarket).


Kinja'd!!! interstate366, now In The Industry > not for canada - australian in disguise
06/21/2016 at 19:16

Kinja'd!!!1

St. Regis though


Kinja'd!!! Urambo Tauro > not for canada - australian in disguise
06/21/2016 at 19:46

Kinja'd!!!1

And just a couple years ago, Dodge didn’t sell the Viper at all in the US.

It was the “SRT Viper”, for some reason.


Kinja'd!!! BmanUltima's car still hasn't been fixed yet, he'll get on it tomorrow, honest. > Sneaky Pete
06/21/2016 at 19:48

Kinja'd!!!1

No. It’s not. He’s right. I’d extend it until 2005 actually.


Kinja'd!!! Sneaky Pete > BmanUltima's car still hasn't been fixed yet, he'll get on it tomorrow, honest.
06/21/2016 at 19:57

Kinja'd!!!0

There’s a reason Gen IIIs are cheaper than Gen IIs. And if you’re going to 05, might as well go to the end of the Gen III line in 06.


Kinja'd!!! Malanga > not for canada - australian in disguise
06/21/2016 at 20:50

Kinja'd!!!3

What’s this “Canada” thing?


Kinja'd!!! BmanUltima's car still hasn't been fixed yet, he'll get on it tomorrow, honest. > Sneaky Pete
06/21/2016 at 21:32

Kinja'd!!!0

No, I mean the Magnum started being made, which is a car worth owning.


Kinja'd!!! not for canada - australian in disguise > Malanga
06/21/2016 at 21:42

Kinja'd!!!0

I don’t know, ask someone else.


Kinja'd!!! Malanga > not for canada - australian in disguise
06/21/2016 at 22:03

Kinja'd!!!1

Sounds pretty radical.


Kinja'd!!! RT > not for canada - australian in disguise
06/22/2016 at 06:28

Kinja'd!!!1

They renamed it the Chrysler Viper in other places as well, so it really confused me when I was younger.